I believe it is from 1781 - General Walking Stick Discussion - Walking Stick Forum

Jump to content

Close
Photo
- - - - -

I believe it is from 1781


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 bobgspinball

bobgspinball

    Newbie

  • Registered
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 29 June 2016 - 07:48 PM

I purchased this walking stick at an Estate Sale in Tennessee. I did some research and may have come across the approximate date it was made. Attached are pictures and a link to the document noting a walking stick with the persons name on it. Could you tell me the value of this walking stick?

 

The cane may have been given by Samuel Rowland Fisher to a Thomas Rogers around 1781.

 

Thank You.  Here is the link   https://books.google...opage&q&f=false

Attached Thumbnails

  • cane 2.JPG
  • cane3.JPG


#2 gdenby

gdenby

    Advanced Member

  • Registered
  • PipPipPip
  • 969 posts
  • LocationNorthern Indiana, aka "Michiana"

Posted 29 June 2016 - 09:24 PM

I worked in an art museum for most of my life. Appraisals must come from accredited appraisers. Market values are sometimes variable by the year. The most the curators at the museum would do is say if the piece looked "right." Within a margin of error, was it authentic?  Were the materials common to a period, were there similar examples in style? And so forth. 

 

If something does have a historical mention, the value goes up some. Understand that huge numbers of all sorts of artifact and art works were made, but were never part of any record. Often, the intrinsic quality of the item is less important than being mentioned in a history. If you can nail down the work's history, you may have something of better than average value.



#3 Batakali

Batakali

    Advanced Member

  • Registered
  • PipPipPip
  • 480 posts
  • LocationSyracuse N.Y.

Posted 30 June 2016 - 01:32 AM

I swear I've seen that face on something else but I can't for the life of me remember where.

#4 Rodney

Rodney

    Advanced Member

  • Registered
  • PipPipPip
  • 1925 posts
  • LocationCentralia, Washington

Posted 30 June 2016 - 04:44 PM

It's certainly a unique stick.  It deserves a real appraisal.

Rodney


  • bobgspinball likes this

#5 bobgspinball

bobgspinball

    Newbie

  • Registered
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 30 June 2016 - 05:22 PM

Where do I get it Appraised?



#6 gdenby

gdenby

    Advanced Member

  • Registered
  • PipPipPip
  • 969 posts
  • LocationNorthern Indiana, aka "Michiana"

Posted 01 July 2016 - 01:17 PM

Where do I get it Appraised?

 

 

Start here. Note, this is a professional service, and they charge accordingly. The one the museum I worked at often used, had a PhD in art history, and on occasion would show up w. a stack of auction record books that would fill a suitcase.


  • bobgspinball likes this

#7 mehig

mehig

    Advanced Member

  • Registered
  • PipPipPip
  • 40 posts
  • LocationKentucky

Posted 03 July 2016 - 01:52 AM

I purchased this walking stick at an Estate Sale in Tennessee. I did some research and may have come across the approximate date it was made. Attached are pictures and a link to the document noting a walking stick with the persons name on it. Could you tell me the value of this walking stick?

 

The cane may have been given by Samuel Rowland Fisher to a Thomas Rogers around 1781.

 

 

The script doesn't look to be from that time period.


Edited by mehig, 03 July 2016 - 11:08 PM.

  • bobgspinball likes this

#8 littleknife

littleknife

    Advanced Member

  • Registered
  • PipPipPip
  • 57 posts
  • LocationArlington, VA

Posted 03 July 2016 - 05:58 PM

I am not an expert, but I think this walking stick is likely from the 19th or the 20th Century, not the 18th.

 

In the late 18th Century walking sticks were made to be elaborate according to the aristocratic European fashion trends of that era.

Ordinary folks imitated the high style of aristocrats. 

 

I would like to reiterate what Bernard Levine, an expert in cutlery history and moderator of several cutlery history and authentication forums likes to repeat:

Just because an old object was made in a rural area, does not mean that it was necessarily crudely made, without much attention to details and without extensive finish.

It is a modern fantasy that assumes that the in the “good old days, when life was simpler”, objects were crude and unfinished (“primitive”).

If anything, everyday objects of old were more elaborate than those mass produced today.

His advise to buyers of antique objects is to look at the objects, rather the accompanying paperwork, and to buy the item, not the story which comes with it.

 

Ethnic, folksy carved canes did not become a trend until the 19th century.

The way the name is inscribed on the stick is also done a typical 20th Century “folksy” way (a shaved down section on the side of the shank with the bark left on). The inscription is also done in a very modern way. In the 18th and 19th Centuries elaborate or at least “pretty” penmanship was paramount even for the lower classes of society.


Edited by littleknife, 03 July 2016 - 06:15 PM.

  • mehig and bobgspinball like this

#9 littleknife

littleknife

    Advanced Member

  • Registered
  • PipPipPip
  • 57 posts
  • LocationArlington, VA

Posted 03 July 2016 - 06:27 PM

A few tips for how to determine if the stick is made very recently or not:

 

https://www.realorre...-walking-sticks

 

"The number of reproduction folk art canes in the market is growing rapidly. Cheap hand carved canes from Asia show the same tool marks, irregularities and lack of sophistication collectors usually look for in originals. Some imported canes are occasionally enhanced by adding American place-names such as cities and states, 19th century dates and American fraternal and patriotic symbols and emblems.

You can catch many imports by examining the wood. Traditional American folk art canes are almost always formed from a single piece of wood. There is no seam between the shaft and handle. Grain flows uninterrupted from the shaft into the handle because handles are formed by naturally occurring crotches or forks (Fig. 34). The majority of new folk art canes are made of two separate pieces. Even if the new cane is painted, the joint between handle and shaft is usually visible (Fig. 35).

Ultraviolet light is particularly useful for examining folk art canes. Most paints and stains made before mid-20th century look about the same under long wave ultraviolet light as they appear in visible, or room light. Many stains and paints used since the 1950s, especially those used since the 1980s, generally fluoresce brightly. Recently painted names, dates and other enhancements are also commonly revealed under ultraviolet light.

Recently glued enhancements also fluoresce. The glass eyes of the snake on the cover in Fig. 2, for example, are difficult to date mounted in the head. But bright fluorescence around the eyes indicate they have been recently set with glue. Even if the eyes are genuinely old, the new glue proves the cane has been altered.

Many new folk art canes are sold with rubber tips. In our samples, removing the rubber exposed bare wood. Areas of raw unfinished wood in the tip of the shaft are another warning sign of a new cane.

 

Hope this helps.


Edited by littleknife, 03 July 2016 - 06:33 PM.

  • mehig and bobgspinball like this

#10 Rodney

Rodney

    Advanced Member

  • Registered
  • PipPipPip
  • 1925 posts
  • LocationCentralia, Washington

Posted 03 July 2016 - 06:57 PM

good article.

Thank you.

Rodney






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users